Trump’s AG testifies on Capitol Hill after Mueller letter expressing concerns released

by - 5 min read

Trump’s AG testifies on Capitol Hill after Mueller letter expressing concerns released

by - 5 min read


U.S. Attorney General William Barr is facing lawmakers’ questions today for the first time since releasing special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report, as he defends his actions before Democrats who accuse him of spinning the investigation’s findings in President Donald Trump’s favour.

Barr’s appearance before the Senate’s judiciary committee in Washington was expected to highlight the partisan schism around Mueller’s report and the Justice Department’s handling of it.

It will give the attorney general his most extensive opportunity to explain the department’s actions, including a news conference held before the report’s release, and for him to repair a reputation bruised by allegations he’s the president’s protector.

A major focus of the hearing was expected to be the Tuesday night revelation, in reports in the Washington Post and the New York Times, that Mueller expressed frustration to Barr in a letter to the Justice Department and in a phone call, with how the conclusions of his investigation were being portrayed.

A copy of Mueller’s letter to Barr was released Wednesday. In his letter, Mueller raised concerns about a letter that Barr sent to Congress detailing what he said were Mueller’s principal conclusions.

Mueller said Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature and substance” of the special counsel’s work and conclusions.

“There is new public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation,” Mueller said in the letter. “This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the department appointed the special counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.

The Democrat-led House judiciary committee is nearing a date on which Mueller will testify, likely sometime in May, committee chair Jerry Nadler of New York told reporters.

‘High state of agitation’

Barr said in his opening remarks that Mueller finished his investigation without interference and that neither he nor any other Justice Department official overruled any proposed action.

He reiterated that he felt it necessary to issue a four-page statement of “bottom line” conclusions of the Mueller report.

“The body politic was in a high state of agitation,” he said.

The release of the Mueller letter promised to heighten partisan tensions of a session that was already highly anticipated. Barr told Florida congressman Charlie Crist he was unaware of any concerns from the special counsel’s office about the way the report’s findings were characterized in his summary.

The Republican-led Senate committee on Wednesday was chaired by a close ally of the president. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, in his opening statement, asserted there was no doubt Russia interfered in the last presidential election.

“It wasn’t some 400-pound guy sitting somewhere,” he said, mimicking a line Trump used in a 2016 presidential debate.

Committee chair Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, right, seen with Republican colleague Chuck Grassley of Iowa, defended Mueller’s integrity but also took aim at the FBI agent who was removed from the special counsel team. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)

While Trump has continually assailed the probe and even accused Mueller of bias, Graham in his opening statement praised the thoroughness of the investigation and the former FBI director’s integrity.

Graham also highlighted what he characterized as extensive White House co-operation with Mueller’s investigators, an assertion many Democrats and Trump critics are likely to bristle at, given that Trump did not sit down for an in-person interview, opting for a written question-and-answer exchange. As well, he asserted the report made it clear Trump did not obstruct justice.

‘That’s not a crime’

Under questioning from Graham, Barr agreed there was no obstruction by Trump because there was no “underlying crime,” and because the president didn’t exert executive privilege over documents requested by Mueller.

“We do not think in this case the government could show corrupt intent beyond reasonable doubt,” he said at another point, under questioning from Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California.

Feinstein focused on a section of the report in which it was alleged that Trump tried to influence White House counsel Don McGahn to change testimony he gave to the special counsel.

“You have a situation where the president tries to change a lawyer’s account in order to prevent further criticism of himself,” she said.

“That’s not a crime,” Barr responded.

Attorney General William Barr testifies during on Wednesday. He cited a public state of ‘agitation’ to again defend releasing a four-page summary of the Mueller report. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)

Graham also hit on familiar Republican charges that the FBI’s Russia investigation were tainted by law enforcement bias against Trump, reading aloud several derogatory texts by agent Peter Strzok, who was assigned to the special counsel team but removed weeks later.

Strzok, at an earlier time, was also a part of the investigation into the use of Trump rival Hillary Clinton of a so-called homebrew server system at her home while serving as secretary of state for former president Barack Obama. Graham blasted the handling of that particular investigation in his statement.

The tense relations between Democrats and Barr are notable, given how Barr breezed through his confirmation process, picking up support from a few Democrats and offering reassuring words about the Justice Department’s independence and the importance of protecting the special counsel’s investigation.

House Democrats are trying to get former FBI director Robert Mueller, who oversaw the special counsel probe, to testify. (Cliff Owen/Associated Press)

In his letter in March, Barr revealed that he and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein had cleared Trump of obstruction of justice after Mueller and his team found evidence on both sides of the question but didn’t reach a conclusion.

After the letter’s release, Barr raised eyebrows anew when he told a congressional committee he believed the Trump campaign had been spied on, a common talking point of the president and his supporters.

Barr told Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island on Wednesday that he “was not suggesting any perjorative” when he used the term spying, calling it an off-the-cuff characterization.

In addition to his four-page letter — Barr continued to bristle at the description of it as a “summary” — the attorney general held an April 18 news conference prior to the release of the redacted Mueller report later that day.

He repeated about a half-dozen times during the news conference that Mueller’s investigation had found no evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia, though the special counsel took pains to note in his report that “collusion” was not a legal term, and also pointed out the multiple contacts between the campaign and Russia.

Barr is also invited to appear Thursday before the Democratic-led House judiciary panel, but negotiations were ongoing as to the format of the questioning.

This story originally appeared on CBC

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *